<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BDSM Weblog &#187; g-spot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bdsmweblog.com/tag/g-spot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bdsmweblog.com</link>
	<description>My thoughts on, and experiences in, the BDSM lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:06:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>G-Spot May Not Exist?</title>
		<link>http://bdsmweblog.com/2010/01/23/g-spot-may-not-exist/</link>
		<comments>http://bdsmweblog.com/2010/01/23/g-spot-may-not-exist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sammael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Educational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g-spot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bdsmweblog.com/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, so this one isn&#8217;t exactly BDSM-related, and it&#8217;s from a while ago (I just now saw this post laying around in my drafts folder) but I still find it noteworthy.  Researchers in London claim conclusive proof that the idea of a G-spot is subjective (which is basically saying that it doesn&#8217;t actually exist). I&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so this one isn&#8217;t exactly BDSM-related, and it&#8217;s from a while ago (I just now saw this post laying around in my drafts folder) but I still find it noteworthy.  Researchers in London claim <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6925836/G-spot-may-not-exist-say-scientists.html">conclusive proof</a> that the idea of a G-spot is subjective (which is basically saying that it doesn&#8217;t actually exist).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll preface this by saying that I have not seen the actual study, so I can only base my opinions off of the little information given in the article.</p>
<p>In a nutshell, it seems like they just asked a bunch of twins (fraternal and identical), &#8220;Do you have a g-spot?&#8221;   This is horrible research methodology.  It&#8217;s like going to 1920s households and asking the women if they&#8217;ve ever experienced an orgasm.   &#8220;A significant number of women said that they had never experienced orgasm, therefore we conclude that the female orgasm does not actually exist.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re serious about this, how about you start by doing some research on female cadavers?   Map out nerve endings, that sort of thing.</p>
<p>To play my own devil&#8217;s advocate, I see the point of this study.   I get the impression that the people behind this study believe that many women don&#8217;t receive pleasure in that way, and feel like there must be something wrong with them.   Personally I think in most cases that&#8217;s most likely because their partner doesn&#8217;t know how to properly stimulate it, but that&#8217;s neither here nor there.  The study is meant to say, &#8220;There, there.  It&#8217;s okay.  No pressure.&#8221;  (Pun intended.)  But if you want to say that, then just <em>say it</em>.  Don&#8217;t try to prove it with bogus science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bdsmweblog.com/2010/01/23/g-spot-may-not-exist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

