<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Positive S&amp;M in the Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bdsmweblog.com/2009/01/15/positive-sm-in-the-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bdsmweblog.com/2009/01/15/positive-sm-in-the-media/</link>
	<description>My thoughts on, and experiences in, the BDSM lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 22:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://bdsmweblog.com/2009/01/15/positive-sm-in-the-media/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bdsmweblog.com/?p=26#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I liked “Secretary” more than lady heather couse its like a real couble experince new thingsbut lady heather focus on a life style.
I couldnt see &quot;Rome&quot; . it needs another link couse &#039;youtube&#039; says its a private video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked “Secretary” more than lady heather couse its like a real couble experince new thingsbut lady heather focus on a life style.<br />
I couldnt see &#8220;Rome&#8221; . it needs another link couse &#8216;youtube&#8217; says its a private video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammael</title>
		<link>http://bdsmweblog.com/2009/01/15/positive-sm-in-the-media/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bdsmweblog.com/?p=26#comment-10</guid>
		<description>It certainly isn&#039;t an ideal representation of BDSM, no.  However, as far as something digestible by the American culture at large, I think it did a reasonably good job of giving an example of a BDSM relationship (though admittedly unrealistic in many ways, as you point out).

Interesting link.  I&#039;ve always known on an intuitive level that romantic comedies (and romance movies in general) are incredibly unrealistic.  Movies in general tend to be that way -- exaggerated at the least, ranging to the fantastical.  I would like to dig into the study itself more.  As is said in statistics, correlation does not imply causation -- it just could be that people who already have unrealistic goals of relationships tend to watch those movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly isn&#8217;t an ideal representation of BDSM, no.  However, as far as something digestible by the American culture at large, I think it did a reasonably good job of giving an example of a BDSM relationship (though admittedly unrealistic in many ways, as you point out).</p>
<p>Interesting link.  I&#8217;ve always known on an intuitive level that romantic comedies (and romance movies in general) are incredibly unrealistic.  Movies in general tend to be that way &#8212; exaggerated at the least, ranging to the fantastical.  I would like to dig into the study itself more.  As is said in statistics, correlation does not imply causation &#8212; it just could be that people who already have unrealistic goals of relationships tend to watch those movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarisse</title>
		<link>http://bdsmweblog.com/2009/01/15/positive-sm-in-the-media/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarisse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bdsmweblog.com/?p=26#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen the other two, but have mixed feelings about &quot;Secretary&quot;.  Yes, it is kind of overall positive, but it doesn&#039;t actually give us any idea of how to create any reasonable communication in a relationship.  On the other hand, &lt;a href=&quot;http://twoliablog.com/relationship-underarm-stick/2008/12/16/do-romantic-comedies-ruin-relationships/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;romantic comedies never do&lt;/a&gt;, and I guess it&#039;s pretty cool to have a BDSM romantic comedy out there.

I also don&#039;t like the way it makes it seem like neither partner in that relationship has any actual preferences.  Seriously, they just do whatever ... there&#039;s no indication that one of them has any real sexual preferences, other than &quot;yay BDSM&quot;, which is too broad.  Again though, what can you expect from a romantic comedy?  I guess vanilla romantic comedies are simply &quot;yay sex&quot; with no talk of preferences, so ... it&#039;s just doing what other romantic comedies already do, and I just notice it more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen the other two, but have mixed feelings about &#8220;Secretary&#8221;.  Yes, it is kind of overall positive, but it doesn&#8217;t actually give us any idea of how to create any reasonable communication in a relationship.  On the other hand, <a href="http://twoliablog.com/relationship-underarm-stick/2008/12/16/do-romantic-comedies-ruin-relationships/" rel="nofollow">romantic comedies never do</a>, and I guess it&#8217;s pretty cool to have a BDSM romantic comedy out there.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t like the way it makes it seem like neither partner in that relationship has any actual preferences.  Seriously, they just do whatever &#8230; there&#8217;s no indication that one of them has any real sexual preferences, other than &#8220;yay BDSM&#8221;, which is too broad.  Again though, what can you expect from a romantic comedy?  I guess vanilla romantic comedies are simply &#8220;yay sex&#8221; with no talk of preferences, so &#8230; it&#8217;s just doing what other romantic comedies already do, and I just notice it more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

